Legal Opinion

Bohn v. Bohn

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1911No. Civ. No. 881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County refusing to change the place of trial. Z. B. West, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of .the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Plaintiff on the 19th of April, 1910, filed his complaint against defendant, alleging ownership of and right of possession to each of twenty-eight head of cattle in defendant’s pasture in Los Angeles county, California; further alleging wrongful detention thereof by defendant, with demand and a prayer for judgment for the possession, or the value if the same could not be had. Process was regularly served upon defendant, and within due time, to wit, on the twenty-second day of April, 1910, defendant filed a demurrer to the complaint, and at the same time filed an affidavit setting forth that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Acock v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Barry v. CoughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bohn v. BohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Rosemary Properties, Inc. v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Rosemary Properties, Inc. v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API