Legal Opinion

Cabrera v. Collazo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 2014PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Tom, J.E

The remarkable defense proffered in this professional malpractice action is that an attorney who neglects a matter so that the statute of limitations runs against his client cannot be held legally accountable if the attorney happens to expire before the applicable limitations period. A cause of action for attorney malpractice requires: “ ‘(1) the negligence of the attorney; (2) that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and (3) proof of actual damages’ ” (Kaminsky v Herrick, Feinstein LLP, 59 AD3d 1, 9 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 715…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Arrington v. New York Times Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baines v. Daily News L.P.New York Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Buxton v. ZukoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Buxton v. ZukoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Kritzer v. Ventura Insurance Brokerage, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Seaman v. Schulte Roth & Zabel LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API