Perkins v. Perkins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from■ Superior Court, Pittsburg County; P. D. Brewer, Judge. Action for divorce by Beulah M. Perkins against Lee Perkins. From a decree for defendant on his cross-bill, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
SIIABP, 0.
The errors assigned by plaintiff in error in her petition in error do not include the action of the trial court in overruling the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, and therefore all of the errors assigned that occurred during the trial cannot be considered, according to the many decisions of this court. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. Dyer, 36 Okla. 112, 128 Pac. 265, and authorities cited. In the above ease it was said:
“Motion for new trial was filed and overruled, to which defendant excepted. But the action of the court in overruling said motion for a new trial 'has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Steed v. KnowlesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Weaver v. KuchlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. DyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bridge Co. v. BarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Chambers v. KerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Blaine County Bank v. NobleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Philip Carey Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Pleasant v. Allen Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Board of Com'rs of Beaver County v. LangstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.