Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Spectra Physics
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 23, 1992No. WCB 90-22539; CA A73639PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that her injury is not compensable. We affirm.
Claimant suffered a compensable injury in September, 1989. When she was returning from a treatment for the injury in October, she was injured in an automobile accident. Employer denied her claim for the October injury, and the referee and the Board upheld the denial.
Claimant argues that the injuries sustained in the October accident are compensable, because they are work-related. Under our decision in Fenton v. SAIF, 87 Or App 78, 741 P2d 517, rev den 304 Or 311 (1987), she would…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Albany General Hospital v. GasperinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Fenton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baar v. Fairview Training CenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Kephart v. Green River LumberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. PitzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Harris v. Mackin & AssociatesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.