Legal Opinion

Baar v. Fairview Training Center

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 21, 1996No. WCB 92-13378; CA A84296PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that held, inter alia, that his hypertension condition was not compensable and that housekeeping services recommended by his treating physician were not reimbursable medical services. We affirm.

In 1986, claimant developed left knee problems after he slipped and fell on some stairs. One year later, in August 1987, claimant began working at Fairview Training Center, where he worked until March 1988. In 1989, a referee determined that claimant’s work activities there independently contributed to a worsening of his left knee…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Volk v. America West AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Albany General Hospital v. GasperinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Hicks v. Spectra PhysicsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. McClendon v. Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Deluxe Cabinet Works v. MessmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Sanford v. Balteau Standard/SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Whitlock v. Klamath County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. VasquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Morelli v. Argonaut Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API