Legal Opinion

Kephart v. Green River Lumber

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 3, 1993No. 90-15053 and 90-15054; CA A74706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board'holding that his injury is not compensable. We affirm.

Claimant suffered a compensable hand injury in 1982 while working for SAIF’s insured, Dillard Hass. From March, 1990, to May 9, 1990, claimant participated in an authorized training program as a long haul truck driver. He injured his shoulder while on a job trial with Green River Lumber as apart of his vocational rehabilitation. SAIF denied the claim. The Board upheld the denial on the ground that, under ORS 656.005(7)(a)(A), the shoulder injury is a consequence of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albany General Hospital v. GasperinoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Wood v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Hicks v. Spectra PhysicsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. PitzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API