Legal Opinion
Schartner v. Copeland
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 23, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 72-235PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
On May 18, 1973, a hearing was held to consider the motions of Defendants Copeland, Gibney and Harbold to set aside the entry of default against them. At the close of the hearing, the Court issued an order granting the motions. This Opinion sets forth the reasons for that Order.
The Plaintiff, a prisoner at the State Correctional. Institution, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, was permitted to file this pro se civil rights action in forma pau-peris on May 3, 1972. The complaint *655charged that the six Defendants conspired to convict the Plaintiff by perjured testimony. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Fehlhaber v. Indian Trails, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- In re Arthur Treacher's Franchisee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- BDM, INC. v. Sageco, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- Garcia v. BallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Heleasco Seventeen, Inc. v. DrakeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.