Legal Opinion
In re Arthur Treacher's Franchisee Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 15, 1981No. MDL No. 467PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HANNUM, District Judge.
I. Preliminary Statement
This Memorandum and the Order which follows it will dispose of the following pending motions:
*403(1) Motion to Amend Plaintiff’s Complaint, Civil Action No. 80-3625, Docket Entry No. 9(2) Defendant Horstmyer’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Amendment to the Complaint, Civil Action No. 80-3625, Docket Entry No. 11(3) Defendant Horstmyer’s Motion to Dismiss for Insufficiency of Service of Process or in the Alternative for a More Definite Statement, Civil Action No. 81-1085, Docket Entry No. 5(4) Motion of Defendants Arthur Treacher’s…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Imo Industries, Inc. v. Kiekert AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Beacon Enterprises, Inc. v. Mary Rose MenziesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- National Industrial Sand Ass'n v. GibsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.