Legal Opinion
Heleasco Seventeen, Inc. v. Drake
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 22, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 83-413-JLLPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
I. FACTS
Presently before the Court in this diversity case is the motion of defendants, Chester E. and Carl E. Drake, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 60(b), to set aside a default judgment entered against them by the Clerk of this Court. (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 11.) The chronology of events leading up to this motion may be summarized as follows: Plaintiff, Heleasco Seventeen, Inc. (“Heleasco”), on June 28, 1988, filed its complaint in this Court against the defendants as guarantors on a leveraged lease transaction.1 Defendant, Chester, a citizen of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Aida Feliciano v. Reliant Tooling Company, Ltd. And Union Special Corporation, Sun Alliance and London Insurance, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Andrew N. Farnese v. Alberto M. Bagnasco and Laila Covre, A.K.A. Laila Bagnasco. Appeal of Alberto M. BagnascoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. LedererCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. CrossDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Dynasteel Corp. v. Aztec Industries, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Apartment Communities Corp. v. MartinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Journey v. LongMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Holmes v. HolmesMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.