Legal Opinion
Eli L. Medunic and Dolores M. Medunic v. Louis W. Lederer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 19, 1976No. 75-1320PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity action for damages, allegedly incurred in an automobile accident, a default was entered against the defendant-appellant Louis W. Lederer for failure to answer or otherwise plead to the plaintiffs-appellees’ complaint within 20 days after its service. The district court subsequently orally denied the defendant’s motion to set aside the default and forthwith proceeded to a non-jury trial on the issue of damages only. 1 Thereafter, the district court filed a “Memorandum” in which it grounded its denial of the motion to set aside the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Tolson v. HodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
- Erick Rios Bridoux v. Eastern Air Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Barber v. TurbervilleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Hutton v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- United Coin Meter Company, Inc., a Michigan Corporation v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad, a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Davis v. MuslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- John C. Keegel v. Key West & Caribbean Trading Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Aida Feliciano v. Reliant Tooling Company, Ltd. And Union Special Corporation, Sun Alliance and London Insurance, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Monge v. Portofino RistoranteDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.