Legal Opinion
In Re Series 7 Broker Qualification Exam Scoring Litigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 7, 2007No. Misc. Action No. 06-355 (JDB), MDL NO. 1772PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
This multidistrict litigation is the result of a mistake in the scoring of a broker qualification examination that led a number of individuals to believe erroneously that they had failed when in fact they had obtained a passing score. Plaintiffs have each brought an action for money damages on behalf of a putative class consisting of members who were notified incorrectly that they had failed the exam. Currently before the Court are motions to dismiss filed by defendants National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”), 1 a self-regulatory…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nasdaq Omx Phlx, Inc. v. Pennmont SecuritiesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- In Re Series 7 Broker Qualification Exam Scoring LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Flowers v. Fin. Indus. Regulatory Auth., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Lowe v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Flowers v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.