Legal Opinion

Nasdaq Omx Phlx, Inc. v. Pennmont Securities

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 2012PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FITZGERALD, J.: *

Appellants, PennMont Securities (“PennMont”) and Joseph D. Carapico, appeal from the order entered by the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (“Exchange”). We hold that the Exchange had no authority to initiate a private right of action to collect disciplinary fines imposed by Exchange Rule 651, a rule enacted by the Exchange pursuant to the federal Securities Exchange Act of 19341 (“Exchange Act”). We further hold that even if the Exchange had such authority, and the Exchange had properly pleaded…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Parr, J. v. Ford Motor CompanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Mariner Chestnut Partners, L.P. Ex Rel. Lamm v. LenfestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. McDonald, E. v. Whitewater Challengers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Cresci Construction Services, Inc. v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Indalex Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API