Legal Opinion
Rayburn v. J. C. Penney Outlet Store
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1982No. 81AP-832PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, P.J.
Plaintiff-appellant, Russell Rayburn, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and raises two assignments of error, as follows:
“1. The trial court abused its discretion in holding that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
“2. The trial court abused its discretion and invaded the province of the jury in holding there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.”
Plaintiff Russell Rayburn and his wife Sophie Rayburn were customers at one of defendant Penney’s stores and seek to recover damages for an injury sustained by plaintiff Russell Rayburn…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. FaderOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Debie v. Cochran Pharmacy-Berwick, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
- Jeswald v. HuttOhio Supreme Court · 1968
3Cited by29 opinions
- Paschal v. Rite Aid Pharmacy, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Whiteleather v. YosowitzOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Glimcher v. ReinhornOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Kubiszak v. Rini's SupermarketOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Paul v. Uniroyal Plastics Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.