Legal Opinion

State v. Cameron

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 29, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Polk Distmct Court. — Lawrence DeGraff, Judge. The indictment charges the defendants with the crime of nuisance. Trial to a jury. There was a directed verdict for the defendants, and the State appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

*263exemp”ionLfrom prosecution: performance of governmental functions: nuisance. *262The indictment charges that the defendants, as members of the executive committee of the state board of *263agriculture, did cause and suffer offal and other nauseating substances to be discharged into an open ditch from a sewer emptying out of the state fair . ,. ..... . ,, grounds, the same being injurious to the .... .. ..... .. . public health, and did then and there render impure and unwholesome the water in said open ditch. The defendants interposed a demurrer, which was overruled. Evidence was then introduced, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Minear v. State Board of AgricultureIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Riddoch v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Melvin v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Maia's Adm'r v. Eastern State HospitalSupreme Court of Virginia · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Hoover v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. J. D. Hollingshead Co. v. Board of Control of State InstitutionsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. De Votie v. Iowa State Fair BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. De Votie v. CameronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API