J. D. Hollingshead Co. v. Board of Control of State Institutions
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
Evans, - J.
The doctrine is universally recognized that a sovereign state may not be coerced by the exercise of judicial power. Much less may it be coerced by process from its own courts. This rule is conceded by the appellant, and we need devote no time to its discussion. The material facts appearing in the petition are that the state of Iowa, through its board of control, is engaged in certain manufactures which are calculated to utilize the labor of convicts in its penitentiaries. The plaintiff, by correspondence with the board of control, contracted to deliver ten carloads of staves, to be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Murray v. Wilson Distilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hagood v. SouthernSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- People ex rel. National Cigar Co. v. DulaneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Chance v. TempleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hoover v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Bachman v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Megee v. BarnesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Yoerg v. Iowa Dairy Industry CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Long v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.