Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Iowa State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1928PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kindig, J. —

This proceeding involves the application of Section 4566 of the 1927 Code, which reads as follows:

“No road shall be established through any cemetery. .No road shall, without the owner’s consent, be established through any orchard, or ornamental grounds contiguous to any dwelling house, or so as to cause the removal of any dwelling house or other substantial, permanent, and valuable building. ’ ’

The.plaintiff-appellant is the owner of.a tract of land in Mahaska County. Upon this real estate, contiguous to his dwelling house, is an .orchard, consisting of apple, plum, and cherry…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Board of Liquidation v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Gacke v. Pork Xtra, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Pierce v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. Dal Maso v. County Commrs.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
  4. Welton v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. DAL MASO v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API