Legal Opinion
Jackson v. TOHAN
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 21, 2009No. AC 29459PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The plaintiff, Brenda Jackson, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, Narendra Tohan, on the ground that the plaintiffs claims were not timely filed within the two year statute of limitations under General Statutes § 52-584. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly decided the factual issue concerning when she had actual or constructive knowledge that she had sustained actionable harm. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following facts and procedural…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Tarnowsky v. SocciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Bednarz v. Eye Physicians of Central Connecticut, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Tarnowsky v. SocciConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Peerless Insurance v. TucciaroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peek v. Manchester Memorial HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Jackson v. TOHANSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009