Legal Opinion

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Friesen

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 14, 1992No. 90-1167-CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, District Judge.

The case comes before the court on two motions. Defendants, Pauline E. Rains, Michael J. Friesen and Lydia K. Friesen, ask the court to alter, vacate and set aside its order of July 25, 1991, (Dk. 72) in which the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against defendant Rains was granted as uncontested. Now that defendants Michael J. Friesen and Lydia K. Friesen have *1293filed their response to the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and the bankruptcy stay is no longer effective, the plaintiffs motion is ripe against the Friesens. Oral argument is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Weir v. Anaconda Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API