Legal Opinion
Weir v. Anaconda Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 9, 1985No. 82-2020PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
I
Robert Weir (plaintiff) is the former employee of The Anaconda Company (Anaconda or defendant). Plaintiff brought suit against Anaconda for various employee benefits after he was terminated.
During his employment with Anaconda, he participated in company stock option and…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, Angelo J. Gaetano, Richard P. Evans, John Does I, Ii, and IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Schoenbaum v. FirstbrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Over the Road Drivers, Inc. v. Transport Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Mustang Fuel Corporation, a Corporation v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Cortez v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Noonan v. Staples, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- John E. Washington v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Jensen v. Redevelopment Agency of Sandy CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.