Legal Opinion

Application of Bremner

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 9, 1950No. Patent Appeal 5638PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the final rejection of all the claims of appellants’ application for patent, serial number 483,338.

The claims are numbered 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, and 12 to 25, inclusive.

Claim 21 is the only product claim. It reads: “21. As a new composition of matter, polydihydropyran.”

It was quoted by the board as representative.

Claim No. 1 reads: “1. A process for the production of polymers of dihydropyran which comprises treating dihydropyran in the liquid phase and under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smokador Mfg. Co. v. Tubular Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. Scovill Mfg. Co. v. SatlerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1927
  3. Potter v. ToneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1911
  4. In Re HolmesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. TrevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  5. Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API