Legal Opinion

Atlantic Oil Producing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1940No. 44000PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

The plaintiff sues to recover interest on an alleged overpayment in respect of its capital stock liability for 1936. If there was an overpayment “in respect of” this capital stock tax, plaintiff is entitled to recover under section 614(a) of the Revenue Act of 1928, 45 Stat. 791, 876, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code § 3771(a), which provides: “Interest shall be allowed and paid upon any overpayment in respect of any internal revenue tax at the rate of 6 per centum per annum. * * * ”

On July 29, 1936, the plaintiff was contemplating dissolution. On the next day its capital stock tax…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  3. Moses v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Busser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Charles Leich and Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Hanley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  4. Fortugno v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  5. Rosenman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API