Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 4, 1934No. L-2PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

It is contended on behalf of the plaintiff that the judgment heretofore entered in this case is invalid for the reason that the oral argument was heard by only three judges; that Judge GREEN, who wrote the opinion, did not hear the oral argument, and that one of the judges who heard the oral argument dissented. Chief Justice BOOTH, who considered himself disqualified, took no part and it seems in some way to be considered that the judgment was rendered by only two judges. Such is not the fact. Judgment was rendered by the court, three judges concurring. The fact that a judge who did not hear…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Exchange Irving Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Halle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. American Woolen Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  3. Atlantic Oil Producing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API