Legal Opinion

Eastman Kodak Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 3, 1936No. M-81PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOTH, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, a New Jersey corporation, sues to recover additional interest on an overpayment of its income and profits taxes for the calendar year 1918. The facts giving rise to this controversy, involving plaintiff’s tax liability for a series of years, are set forth in detail in the findings. We do not find it necessary to repeat them in this opinion, for the vital issue in the case is confined to certain specific determinations and official actions of the collector and Commissioner of Internal Revenue in adjusting plaintiff’s returns and claims respecting its tax…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  3. York Safe & Lock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Atlantic Oil Producing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Girard Trust Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941
  4. Aluminum Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  5. Harnischfeger Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API