Richland Irrigation District v. De Bow
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The plaintiff, an irrigation district, brought this action to prohibit the subjecting of property which it owns within the district to general taxation. To the complaint, a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiff refused to plead further and elected to stand upon its complaint. Judgment was entered dismissing the action, from which the plaintiff appeals.
This is a companion case to that of Columbia Irrigation District v. Benton County, ante p. 234, 270 Pac. 813, just decided, so far as the questions involved in that case are concerned. There is, however, in this case one…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Eckerson v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Boyd v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Parker-Washington Co. v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- State v. TausickWashington Supreme Court · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. Human Relations Research FoundationWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re HuletWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Libby, McNeill & Libby v. IvarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Kennewick Irrigation District v. Benton CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.