Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Potlatch Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 14, 1996No. 95-386PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY D. Jesson, Chief Justice.

Appellant Larry Thompson, an officer of the Pair-O-Geese Hunting Club, claims that the Potlatch Corporation orally agreed to lease the club hunting and trapping rights to certain lands in Bradley County. When Podatch leased the rights to others, Thompson fried suit for specific performance. The chancellor ruled against the club, finding that no contract had been formed between Pair-O-Geese and Potlatch. We affirm.

Hunting clubs such as Pair-O-Geese have, for many years, hunted the woods of Bradley County on land now owned by Potlatch. In 1989, rumors began to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carruth v. Design Interiors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Riddick v. StreettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Britton v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  4. Meeks v. StevensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Citicorp Industrial Credit, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smith v. Sidney Moncrief Pontiac, Buick, GMC Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Nucor Corp. v. KilmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SmelserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Southern Transit Co. Inc. v. CollumsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API