Legal Opinion

Meeks v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 1990No. 89-183PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis H. Turner, Justice.

Appellant, Susan E. Meeks, challenges the validity of a default judgment obtained by appellee, Arthur Stevens, contending that service of process was never perfected. We agree.

Appellant was formerly employed as a social worker with the Arkansas Social Services Division of the Arkansas Department of Human Services. In August, 1988, she informed appellee and his wife of a Division investigation, directed by her, that revealed possible child abuse and neglect of the children of appellee’s wife. Among other things, the report contained allegations of sexual abuse by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Romeo v. LooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Tapp v. FowlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Smith v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Winters v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  5. In re the Interest of M.L.K.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Southeast Foods, Inc. v. KeenerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Brown v. Arkansas State Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning & Refrigeration (HVACR) Licensing BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Lawson v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Thompson v. Potlatch Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Craig v. DyeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API