Legal Opinion

Haugen v. Neiswonger

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1949No. 30973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action for rescission of a partnership agreement because of alleged fraud. The action was brought against a community of husband and wife; however, in the course of this opinion we shall refer to the respondent husband as if he were the sole defendant, since he alone represented the community.

Neiswonger was the owner of a farm located near Black Diamond, in King county. In the latter part of 1945, he acquired a small sawmill, which he established on his place. He operated the sawmill with more or less success for over a year. On Easter Sunday,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oates v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hurley v. LindsayWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graff v. GeiselWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Fonseca v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API