Standard Oil Co. v. Epley
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Associate Judge.
The above-numbered cases, without being formally consolidated, were briefed together and heard together. The issue is identical in both cases, and they may be disposed of in a single opinion.
The controversy grows out of the application by appellee for registration in the United States Patent Office of the coined word “EPCO” as a trade-mark for use on gasoline and oils. In one instance the drawing shows the word affixed upon the side of a pjictorial representation of an. automobile and in the other on the under side of the wings of an airplane.
Appellant opposes the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- MacEachen v. Tar Products CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Brooklyn Brewery Corporation v. Brooklyn Brew Shop, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Celotex Co. v. MillingtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Trustees for Arch Preserver Shoe Patents v. James McCreery & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.