Legal Opinion
Trustees for Arch Preserver Shoe Patents v. James McCreery & Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 1, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2739PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents in a trade-mark registration opposition proceeding.
On September 20, 1927, appellee James McCreery & Co., filed an application in the United States Patent Office for registration, under the Trade-Mark Registration Act of February 20, 1905 (15 USCA §§ 81-109), of the words “Foot Preserver” for use as a trade-mark on “boots and shoes of leather, canvas or fabric, or combinations thereof.”
The proposed mark having been passed to publication and published in the official gazette, appellant, Trustees For Arch…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Holzapfel's Compositions Co. v. Rahtjen's American Composition Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Michigan Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Sharp & Dohme v. Parke, Davis & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- California Cyanide Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Otard, Inc. v. Italian Swiss ColonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
- Bbk Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Central Coast Agriculture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Pepsodent Co. v. Comfort Mfg. Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Shoe Corporation of America v. Juvenile Shoe Corporation of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.