Legal Opinion

Romann v. Bender

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 11, 1931No. 28,644PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff brought the action to recover damages for personal injury, medical expenses, and loss of earnings, claimed to have been caused by the negligence of the driver of defendant’s automobile in a collision with an automobile owned and driven by plaintiff. Defendant answered, denying all negligence on the part of his driver, charged plaintiff with negligence, and counterclaimed for damages #to his car and for personal injuries to himself. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor.

One of tlie errors assigned on this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. BurrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Romann v. BenderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Fox v. BellonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Campbell v. SargentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Reese v. Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API