Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Sargent

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1932No. 28,853PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendant appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a neiv trial.

Defendant wras driving his automobile southerly on paved trunk highway No. 40 between Blooming Prairie and Austin. His wife was with him. The road was level and straight. It was nighttime. He met a car Avitli dazzling lights. Defendant turned on his dimmers or courtesy lights. This may have retarded his ability to see objects on the road ahead of him, since this light would not tliroAv its rays as far ahead as the regular lamps. Just as the car passed, defendant discovered in front of him…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Romann v. BenderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  3. Burmeister v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Law v. GallegherSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  2. Knuth v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Asumendi v. FergusonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Schaedler v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Marshall v. MullinOregon Supreme Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API