State v. Pearson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
Azie Veamell Pearson was informed against, tried and convicted for the unlawful sale of a narcotic drug (heroin), a felony in violation of A.R.S. § 36-1002.02, as amended. From the conviction and sentence he appeals.
Pearson first urges that the State failed to introduce sufficient evidence to sustain the burden of proof as to whether he sold narcotics. In reviewing the evidence, this Court will view it in the light most favorable to the State and resolve all reasonable inferences against the defendant, State v. Corrales, 95 Ariz. 401, 391 P.2d 563; State v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Elliott Kahaner, Antonio Corallo and James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Wheaton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- State v. GeorgeArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Lindsey v. ElkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. McMurtreyArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Joe Leonard Lambright v. Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State v. BallesterosArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. CookusArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Kirby v. RosellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.