Legal Opinion

State v. Ballesteros

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1966No. 1485PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Chief Justice.

Appellant Hector N. Ballesteros was informed against, tried and convicted on two counts of illegal sale of narcotic drugs in violation of A.R.S. § 36-1002.02, as added. He appeals from the judgments of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial on both counts.

Count One was supported by evidence of a sale on October 18, 1963, and Count Two by evidence of a sale on October 30, 1963. Similar procedures were employed by the police in obtaining evidence in both counts. Informer Henry Lugo made arrangements for a sale with appellant. Lugo would come…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. Interstate Transit Lines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. VallejosArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. State v. MangrumArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. SimsArizona Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. RoseArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Crowe v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State v. CoeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API