Nelson v. Nevel
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARABIAN, J.
Introduction
Plaintiff and appellant, Rita Nelson (appellant), appeals from an order dismissing her complaint against defendant and respondent, Robert C. Nevel (respondent), after respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was sustained without leave to amend.
Facts
Since the trial court rendered judgment for respondent on the pleadings, we must accept the allegations of appellant’s complaint as true, determining whether such allegations state, or can be amended to state, a cause of action. (See Sullivan v. Co. of Los Angeles (1974) 12 Cal.3d 710, 714-715, fn. 3 [117…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Sullivan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whorton v. DillinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Santa Monica Rent Control Board v. BluvshteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Shiver, McGrane & Martin v. LittellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Toney v. NolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Chalmers v. CayneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025