Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Nevel

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1984No. Civ. 68882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff and appellant, Rita Nelson (appellant), appeals from an order dismissing her complaint against defendant and respondent, Robert C. Nevel (respondent), after respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was sustained without leave to amend.

Facts

Since the trial court rendered judgment for respondent on the pleadings, we must accept the allegations of appellant’s complaint as true, determining whether such allegations state, or can be amended to state, a cause of action. (See Sullivan v. Co. of Los Angeles (1974) 12 Cal.3d 710, 714-715, fn. 3 [117…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Sullivan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whorton v. DillinghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Santa Monica Rent Control Board v. BluvshteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Shiver, McGrane & Martin v. LittellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Toney v. NolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Chalmers v. CayneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API