Legal Opinion

Rossi v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 10, 1933No. 594PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

■An indictment, five counts, in the United States Dis-' trict Court, Southern District of Illinois, alleged that petitioners had violated the Internal Revenue laws in sundry ways. The third count charged them with carrying on the business of a distiller without having given the bond required by § 3260, Rev. Stats.,' U.S.C. Title 26, § 284. The fourth charged possession and control of a still not registered as required by § 3258, Rev. Stats., U.S.C. Title 26, § 281“. They pleaded not guilty; waived a jury; went to trial before the Judge. He found them guilty under both the third .and fourth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Yee Hem v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Goodfriend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Fielding M. McGehee III v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  5. People v. BornholdtNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API