Goodfriend v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to' the District Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Idaho; Frank S. Dietrich, Judge. Ii. Goodfriend and others were convicted of violating the prohibition laws, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error were convicted on six counts of an indictment. The first three counts charged them with a conspiracy to possess moonshine whisky for sale, to sell moonshine whisky, and to manufacture moonshine whisky. The fourth *150count charged them with having in their possession a still with accessories ready for operation, without first having registered the same with the collector of internal revefiue; the fifth charged them with carrying on the business of a distillery without having given bond, with intent to defraud the United States of the tax; and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Putnam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ader v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- McCurry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rossi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Beard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- Olmstead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Rubio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Crapo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.