Legal Opinion
Harry Brandt v. Vulcan, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 18, 1994No. 93-2761PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ASPEN, District Judge.
Having fallen off of a portable scaffold known as a “Titzel Tower,” Harry Brandt filed suit against the companies he believed responsible for the equipment’s design and manufacture. After years of litigation, culminating in a trial and a verdict for defendant Vulcan, Inc., Brandt, in post-trial motions, charged Vulcan with discovery fraud and also complained that insufficient evidence and erroneous rulings by the District Court warranted either judgment in his favor as a matter of law, or a new trial. The District Court disagreed and denied Brandt’s motions. This appeal…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Rascon v. HardimanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Karen L. Erickson v. Trinity Theatre, Inc., Individually and D/B/A Trinity Square EnsembleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Tipton v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Ramirez v. T&H Lemont, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Lancaster v. Independent School District No. 5Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Scott A. Lawson v. Dale Trowbridge, Wendell Howland, and Lee RobargeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Woods v. Deangelo Marine Exhaust, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.