Legal Opinion
Commonwealth Insurance v. Thomas A. Greene & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 20, 1989No. 85 Civ. 0912 (RWS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Third-party defendants North River Insurance Company (“North River”) and Crum & Forster Managers Corporation (“Crum & Forster”) have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) Fed.R.Civ.P. to dismiss the third-party complaint filed by defendant and third-party plaintiff Thomas A. Greene & Company, Inc. (“Greene”). The motion was argued on October 21, 1988 and was considered fully submitted on November 21, 1988. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
The Facts and the Amended Complaint
As set forth in the amended complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) of plaintiff…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. GaudetSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Don King Productions, Inc. v. DouglasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Highland Capital Management, L.P. v. SchneiderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- JSC Securities, Inc. v. GebbiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Beatus v. GebbiaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998