Legal Opinion
Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Georgia Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 15, 1934No. 10070PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
The ruling announced in the first headnote does not require elaboration.
In section .4 (a) of the motor-carrier act approved March 31, 1931 (Ga. L. Ex. Sess. 1931, pp. 99-102) it is declared: “No *436motor carrier shall, after this act goes into effect, operate without first obtaining from the commission, after hearing under the provisions of this act, a certificate of public convenience and neeessity, pursuant to findings to the effect that the public interest requires sucli operation.” In section 18 it is declared: “Every motor carrier shall, as soon as the certificate is issued, and annually on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Georgia Public-Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Johnson v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. JerniganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Utilities Insurance v. PotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.