Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Georgia Public Service Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
The validity of a statute of Georgia under the Commerce Clause (Article I, § 8, clause 3) and the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States is challenged by the appellant, a private carrier for hire engaged in interstate commerce.
The statute is known as the “ Motor-Carrier Act of 1931.” Georgia Laws, Ex. Sess. 1931, p. 99. It prescribes a system of regulation for private carriers for hire. Common carriers are subject to the provisions of a separate statute. With exceptions to be stated later, every private carrier operating a motor vehicle in the business of transporting…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Dorchy v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Tigner v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.