Legal Opinion

Utilities Insurance v. Potter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1940No. 27536PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

Charles H. Potter, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, recovered a judgment in the district court of Oklahoma county against R. O. Bur- bridge, hereinafter referred to as defendant, for damages for personal injuries. The judgment became final and garnishment proceedings were issued against Utilities Insurance Company, the insurance carrier of defendant, hereinafter referred to as garnishee. The trial court sustained plaintiff’s demurrer to the garnishee’s answer, which incorporated therein by agreement of the parties all of the evidence on which it relied to defeat its liability. Judgment…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Equity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Spring Valley Wholesale Nursery, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Tri-State Casualty Ins. Co. v. LoperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  3. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  4. Joseph G. Braun v. Harvey Annesley Joe E. Bradley, Sr. O.F. Bailey Joe E. Bradley, Jr., Tri-State Insurance Company, Garnishee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Travelers Ins. Co. v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API