Holbrook v. Investment Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Action by F. B. Holbrook and another to recover from the Investment Company certain commissions alleged to be due for selling certain lots. There was a judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Moore.
*260This is an action by S. B. Riggen and F. B. Holbrook against the Investment Company, a corporation, to recover compensation for services in negotiating sales of real property on credit, the contracts for which were can-celled by the defendant for failure of the purchasers to pay the installments of the purchase price at the time agreed upon. The record discloses that on October 7, 1890, the plaintiffs, as partners, were employed by the defendant to negotiate the sale of certain town lots in Irvington Park, Multnomah County, for which service it agreed to pay…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frink v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Booth v. MoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Fisk v. HenarieOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- Burkhart v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- Sayre v. MohneyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kemmerer v. Title & Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Comstock Mfg. Co. v. SchiffmannOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Hardy v. SheedyOregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Leventritt v. CowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Van Varick v. Suburban Investment Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.