Vaughn v. Sturm-Hughes

OPINION

CAYCE, Chief Justice.

Appellant William Thomas Vaughn sued appellee Catherine A. Sturm-Hughes for personal injuries arising from an automobile accident. The trial court granted summary judgment, ordering that Vaughn take nothing from Sturm-Hughes on the grounds that his claims are barred by limitations. In his sole point of error, Vaughn asserts that a genuine issue of material fact exists on the question of whether Sturm-Hughes is es-topped from relying on the defense of limitations because her insurance company’s adjuster allegedly failed to disclose the identity of the driver of the…