Legal Opinion

Centeq Realty, Inc. v. Siegler

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1995No. 94-0573PublishedCited by 1,166 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCornyn, Justice

In this premises liability case, we consider whether Centeq Realty, Inc., (Centeq) owed Karelyn Siegler a duty of reasonable care to protect her from the criminal acts of a third party. The trial court granted Centeq’s motion for summary judgment. The court of appeals reversed. 874 S.W.2d 304. Because we determine that Centeq owed no legal duty to Siegler, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and render judgment that Siegler take nothing from Centeq.

Through a number of foreclosures, United Savings (United) came to own a majority of the units at the Warwick Towers, a high-rise…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Castleberry v. BranscumTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. ReynaTexas Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,166 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Walker v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Timberwalk Apartments, Partners, Inc. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lujan v. Navistar, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1995

1,161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API