Legal Opinion

Hill v. Bartlette

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided December 20, 2005No. 06-05-00031-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*544OPINION

Opinion by

Justice ROSS.

Raynell Hill sued Chad McKinley Bart-lette for wrongfully causing the death of her daughter, Randina Raye Burleson. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Bartlette. Hill appeals, contending in her sole point of error the trial court erred in granting that judgment.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment because Hill failed to negate Bartlette’s statute of limitations defense. Also, Bart-lette proved as a matter of law that Hill is barred from bringing the current claims because there has been an accord and satisfaction on all claims.

Standard of Review

T…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Valls v. Johanson & Fairless, L.L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  2. Tyson Rhine and Sandra Rhine v. Priority One Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
  3. Border Demolition & Environmental, Inc. v. Ernesto Pineda, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2017
  4. Kiger v. BalestriCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. Nears v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API