Legal Opinion
Wambeck v. Lovetri
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 3, 1954PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action for an injunction and damages. The court rendered judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiffs have appealed.
The material facts found are the following: Prior to May 22, 1916, George Boles, then the owner of land bounded on the east by Sherwood Place, in the town of Greenwich, laid out a roadway through the tract to the property west of it, now owned by the defendant. The roadway, which extended 190 feet westerly from Sherwood Place, is known as Putnam Court. Boles divided his property on the north and south sides of the roadway into lots and sold one,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Peck v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Fitzgerald v. Merard Holding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Berry v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- McPheters v. LoomisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Greene v. CannyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sanchione v. SanchioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Slattery v. MaykutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Holt v. WissingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Hartford Electric Light Co. v. LevitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Leabo v. LeninskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.