Pillo v. Jim Banes Ford, Inc.

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The sole issue raised on this appeal from the denial of a motion for judgment n.o.v. is whether the court below erred in refusing to rule as a matter of law that appellant’s employee was not acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the accident in question. Since the jury returned a verdict in favor of appellee, we must affirm the judgment below if any reasonable inference from the facts supports the finding that the employee was acting in furtherance of appel lant’s business when he negligently injured appellee. See Davis v. Tredwell, 347 Pa. 341, 32 A. 2d…