Legal Opinion

Davis v. Tredwell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 11, 1943No. Appeal, 160PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

Plaintiff brought this action in trespass and secured a verdict against Michael Tredwell and his employer, Fanny Tredwell. The court below refused defendants’ motions for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v. Judgment having been entered on the verdict, Fanny Tredwell appealed to this court.

Plaintiff, Harriet E. Davis, was injured when one of defendants, Michael Tredwell, backed an automobile against her and knocked her to the ground under circumstances that leave no room for doubt that the jury was warranted in finding, as it did, that her injuries were caused by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parker v. Matheson Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Kapuscianski v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Green v. BrooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Kremposky v. Mt. Jessup Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Zondler v. Foster Mfg. & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kimble v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Potter Title and Trust Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Iandiorio v. Kriss & Senko Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Pillo v. Jim Banes Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Nelson v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API