Legal Opinion

Anzenberger v. NICKOLS

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1964No. Appeal, 174PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

This appeal comes to us from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict after the refusal of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County to grant the appellant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

In this action of trespass, the jury returned a verdict of $68,000. in favor of the plaintiff-appellee against the Campbell Sales Company, defendant appellant, and a verdict in favor of Campbell Sales Company, over and against Theodore E. Nichols. A motion for compulsory nonsuit was granted in favor of Campbell Soup Company.

The facts which the jury could have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Maloy v. Rosenbaum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Exner v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Simon v. H. K. Porter Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Webb v. North Side Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  2. Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Shuman Estate v. WeberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Iandiorio v. Kriss & Senko Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Jacob Norton v. Railway Express Agency, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API