Legal Opinion

Petition of O'Donnell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 31, 1952PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNulty, J.

On Exceptions certified from Public Utilities Commission under Section 66, Chapter 40, R. S., 1944.

The petitioner, Waldo S. O’Donnell, is engaged in the business of transporting freight and merchandise for hire in contract carriage by motor vehicle. He holds a permit issued by the Public Utilities Commission authorizing the transportation of coal, asphalt or tar mix, rock, sand and gravel from certain designated places in Maine to other places specified in the said permit. He seeks further authority to transport bulk cement from points in Maine to road, bridge and mixing plant and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Caribou Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
  2. Gilman v. Somerset Farmers Co-Operative Telephone Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  3. Maine Motor Coaches, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  4. Public Utilities Commission v. GallopSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  5. Public Utilities Commission v. Johnson Motor TransportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fisher v. DameSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Lewiston, Greene & Monmouth Telephone Co. v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  3. In Re ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
  4. Application of BallardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  5. In Re Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API